CFC's can be cached in the application scope, so you don't have to include the file every time, plus it should run at least slightly faster.
Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:50 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFC, YES OR NO > > On Feb 6, 2008 12:24 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't agree with that at all. > > > > the use of CFCs doesn't necessarily have anything to do with object > > oriented design. Lots of CFCs are just groupings of functions to > > perform application tasks. But they're not really object oriented at > > all, they're functional. > > just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use > CFCs at all? if you're just grouping similar functions together, why > not just a cfinclude to a .cfm? > > paul kenney actually addressed this a lil' while back: > http://www.pjk.us/paul/index.cfm/2007/4/11/Why-do-you-use-CFCs > > interesting read :) > > -- > Evelyn the dog, having undergone further modification pondered the > significance of short-person behaviour in pedal depressed, > pan-chromatic resonance, and other highly ambient domains. "Arf," she > said. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:298399 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
