Have you read the ColdFusion Builder docs about adding third-party plugins?
I posted about setting up SVN on my blog and as a part of that I always choose the Subclipse Integration for Mylin. Is this all your looking for? The docs from Adobe state you must add the Ganymede Update site in order for third-party plugins to install properly since this update site allows you to grab the needed dependancies. See my blog post (http://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2009/7/14/Getting-Started-with-ColdFusion-Builder ) for Getting Started with ColdFusion Builder or read the Adobe Documentation if you have not added the Ganymede Update. Wil Genovese One man with courage makes a majority. -Andrew Jackson A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well. On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Greg Luce wrote: > > Adam or anyone else have any luck installing Mylyn to the > standalone? That's > a deal-breaker for me. > > Greg Luce > Luce Consulting Services, Inc. > www.luceconsulting.net > (863) 273-0289 > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Cutter (ColdFusion) < > cold.fus...@cutterscrossing.com> wrote: > >> >> No, I don't think it is. >> >> It ilooks to me as if there are large blocks of code, within >> ColdFusion >> Builder, that were written by Mark Drew (and it seems I have heard >> that >> somewhere). It stands to reason that they wouldn't interoperate, as >> ultimately they don't just have similar classes and functions, they >> are >> the same classes and functions. From what I can tell, ColdFusion >> Builder >> has every feature that CFEclipse has, plus more. But, we're talking >> two >> separate spaces here: ColdFusion Builder will presumably be a paid >> application, whereas CFEclipse is an open source application. Is >> there a >> need to use both simultaneously? No, I don't think so. The only >> reason I >> can (currently) see for switching back and forth is if you are also >> using the CFFrameworks or MxUnit tools (which are separate), and I'm >> sure someone will write CFB extensions to emulate that functionality. >> >> If someone wrote a warning into the installer, and I'm not saying >> they >> haven't (though I haven't seen it), I can see where there's a very >> valid >> reason for doing so. It's not an attempt to push out the little >> guy, or >> put you in Adobe's black box. It would be a valid warning to let you >> (the user) know that you will probably have incompatibility issues >> that >> will compromise your productivity. >> >> Steve "Cutter" Blades >> Adobe Certified Professional >> Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer >> >> Co-Author of "Learning Ext JS" >> http://www.packtpub.com/learning-ext-js/book >> _____________________________ >> http://blog.cutterscrossing.com >> >> >> On 7/16/2009 9:46 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote: >>> By "prepared", I meant that the statement was ready to be delivered >>> upon even finding the installation of CFEclipse. >>> >>> Meaning that Adobe must have set up the installation process to look >>> for a CFE installation and warn that the two could not be used >>> together. >>> >>> i.e....choose sides...we won't or can't play together on the same >>> playground. >>> >>> How is my assessment inaccurate? >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:adrocknapho...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:38 AM >>> To: cf-talk >>> Subject: Re: CF9 and Bolt in eWEEK >>> >>> >>> Prepared statement? News to me. Can you point me to it? >>> -Adam Lehman >>> ColdFusion Project Manager >>> Adobe Systems Inc >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Rick Faircloth >>> <r...@whitestonemedia.com>wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Yeah, well, it certainly made me a little suspicious when there >>>> was a >>>> seemingly "prepared" statement ready to pounce on CFEclipse when >>>> its >>>> installation was detected. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:11 PM >>>> To: cf-talk >>>> Subject: Re: CF9 and Bolt in eWEEK >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> It could be that there are unavoidable, inherent conflicts >>>>> between the >>>>> two plug-ins...or it could be that the 500-lb Adobe gorilla is >>>>> >>>> purposefully >>>> >>>>> creating unnecessary incompatibilities in order to muscle out the >>>>> competition... >>>>> >>>> Given the likelihood of conflict between two Eclipse plugins that >>>> do >>>> the same thing, I don't think we need to ascribe malice to Adobe. >>>> >>>> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software >>>> http://www.figleaf.com/ >>>> >>>> Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized >>>> instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, >>>> Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. >>>> Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:324607 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
