Graham Perrin wrote: > > Q: Is backup.chex alone sufficient for an automated upgrade routine? >
The answer to that +may+ be "yes". (I need to first: clarify some of the expressions used within the +Start-up Options for Chandler+ dialogue, screen shots at <http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/GrahamPerrin20090106>; then learn how/when automation might occur.) Other questions relating to backup.chex are unanswered. No rush. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Understanding-and-housekeeping-weeding-%281%29-binary_backup.tgz-%282%29-backup.chex-%283%29-date-time-stamped-.chex-files-%284%29-__repository__.*-directories-tp2109816p2117890.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
