Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Freenet)

[David McNab]

Troll alert! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "freenet-chat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Freenet) > Tavin Cole wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:01:13AM +0900, Sam Joseph wrote: > > > > Um, I was under the impression that all data (text, etc..) on > freenet > > > > is encrypted - how the hell are you going to implement a language > > > > filter on that ? > > > > > > If you wanted to filter it you could do it at the nodes when people > > > inserted stuff. > > > No, you couldn't. > > Why not? > > > > I'm not recommending doing it, I'm just trying to > > > discuss what is possible. > > > It is not possible. > > I don't believe you. > > What is it with this? Are you telling me that I couldn't set up a P2P > network that stored cryptographically hashed content and did routing > like freenet, but where the nodes blocked input of non natural-language > text files? > > You might not like it, but I don't think there are any technical reasons > why it couldn't be done. > > And anyway, I'm not suggesting you do it, or even intending to do it > myself, I'm still just trying to ask > > "DOES protecting freedom of speech REQUIRE the ability to _anonymously_ > distribute IMAGES and not just natural language TEXT." > > I'm beginning to think that I'm asking in the wrong place. > > CHEERS> SAM > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chat mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat > _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat