On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:26:26PM -0600, Mark J Roberts wrote: > Tavin Cole: > > One is that we all know that WhackAMole(tm) key censoring software > > simply won't work. > > Its effectiveness depends on how quickly they whack the moles. I can > imagine a one hour window between link publication and whacking.
How optimistic of you. > > The other is that at least under the DMCA (and probably any > > similar laws around the world) the CoS would have to ask the node > > operator to remove the keys from his node before taking him to > > court. > > Due to the rate at which Freenet caches new data, the Church would > argue, the DMCA's specific file removal provisions are inadequate. They would still have to lobby for, and await the passing of, more stringent legislation before they could force you to do anything not prescribed under the DMCA (or whatever law under similar systems). -tc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20020206/de3a0060/attachment.pgp>
