On Wednesday 02 July 2008 23:47:34 Pete Templin wrote: > I went from OSPF to ISIS a few years ago for several > reasons. The relevant reasons are:
One of the biggest reasons we made the switch is that IS-IS allows us to "string" our network across the globe easier than OSPF, because OSPF has the "all areas must connect to the backbone area" rule - and we don't like virtual links. All other reasons were gravy; although we do like the fact that v6 is implemented in the same IS-IS protocol as v4. > 1) We have some use for Catalyst 3550s in our network, > and AFAIK they don't speak ISIS. This is very annoying. We had a chat with our SE, and the DSBU are considering supporting IS-IS (initially for v4) on the 3560G (which we have a lot of) some time next year. > 2) We're having extreme pain trying to bring up ISIS for > IPv6. What kinds of issues? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
