Hi Oliver, Exactly - not supported. It implies that *if it works (not on SIP-200), it must be software'.
I came across this document before I sent the question. As it seems, that what I'll use. I'm looking for a document that say implicitly 'NBAR implementation is software based' to be sure we didn't run into some sort of bug/mis-configuration. Thank you. Best Regards, Alex. On Jan 22, 2013 8:04 AM, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex, > > > On 22/01/2013 01:19, "Alex K." <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Pete, > > > >We're running 12.2(33)SRA6. > > > > > >On SIP-200 it's running fine (as expected). Configuring > >NBAR-using-policy-map on an *SVI*, causes high CPU Interrupts. > > > > I do believe it's being punted to a CPU. > > > >But this time I need a document that clearly states that i.e. on SIP-200 > >by hardware, on SVI by software and this is not a bug/some other > >malfunctioning. > > > >I'm asking for a document from which we can understand that, yes, using > >NBAR on an SVI will make those packets punted. Technically I agree with > >you > >completely, most likely that¹s what happening. > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/15S/configuration/guide/qo > s.html says "The PFC does not support Network-Based Application > Recognition (NBAR).", this is valid for earlier SW releases as well. So > your config on the SVI is not supported. > > SIP200 Datasheets clearly state NBAR support. > > oli > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
