* say explicitly ... On Jan 22, 2013 11:47 AM, "Alex K." <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Oliver, > > Exactly - not supported. It implies that *if it works (not on SIP-200), it > must be software'. > > I came across this document before I sent the question. As it seems, that > what I'll use. > > I'm looking for a document that say implicitly 'NBAR implementation is > software based' to be sure we didn't run into some sort of > bug/mis-configuration. > > Thank you. > > Best Regards, > Alex. > On Jan 22, 2013 8:04 AM, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> >> On 22/01/2013 01:19, "Alex K." <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi Pete, >> > >> >We're running 12.2(33)SRA6. >> > >> > >> >On SIP-200 it's running fine (as expected). Configuring >> >NBAR-using-policy-map on an *SVI*, causes high CPU Interrupts. >> > >> > I do believe it's being punted to a CPU. >> > >> >But this time I need a document that clearly states that i.e. on >> SIP-200 >> >by hardware, on SVI by software and this is not a bug/some other >> >malfunctioning. >> > >> >I'm asking for a document from which we can understand that, yes, using >> >NBAR on an SVI will make those packets punted. Technically I agree with >> >you >> >completely, most likely that¹s what happening. >> >> >> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/15S/configuration/guide/qo >> s.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/15S/configuration/guide/qos.html>says >> "The PFC does not support Network-Based Application >> Recognition (NBAR).", this is valid for earlier SW releases as well. So >> your config on the SVI is not supported. >> >> SIP200 Datasheets clearly state NBAR support. >> >> oli >> >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
