If I remember correct, AS numbers do not have to be contiguous unless if you want automatic redistributing between EIGRP and IGRP. If you have different AS across boundaries then you will need to have to manually redistribute...
My $0.02...
David Luong, CCNA,Network+,A+,i-Net+
Telecommunications Analyst
Insurance Corporation of B.C.
Vancouver, B.C CANADA
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Padjen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EIGRP contiguous AS
I have an interesting question for the group, although
it is not directly related to any of the current
exams.
Does an EIGRP AS have to be contiguous or can it be on
two sides of an IGRP 'AS'. I note that the use of the
term AS is a mis-nomer for both protocols, but...
For example, does:
EIGRP AS 1 ---- IGRP AS 1 ---- EIGRP AS 1
pose a problem?
Does:
EIGRP AS 1 ---- IGRP AS 50 ---- EIGRP AS 1
My belief is that it could work, but it breaks the
concept of an AS and could lead to routing topology
table problems. Any takers?
(I'll be working with my team in the lab, but thought
it was an interesting thought questions.)
Nothing but net!
=====
Robert Padjen
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
