Hi,
I know that this question of mine is not related to this post but since you
all are talking about EIGRP and seem to know the subject matter, I would
like to ask abou the differencs b/w EIGRP and OSPF? What are the major
differences b/w EIGRP and OSPF aside from the fact that EIGRP is Cisco's
proprietary protocal and OSPF is open?
Why would one use EIGRP over OSPF and vice-versa?
I know that EIGRP uses bandwidth as it's metrics and OSPF uses cost but
which one is a better metric?
Please advise.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Cisco Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kenny Sallee"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
>Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:50:06 -0700
>
>Excellent!!!!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>Kenny Sallee
>Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 1:49 PM
>To: Gerwin Boschloo; 'Luong, David'; 'Robert Padjen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: EIGRP contiguous AS
>
>Sure it will work -- if you redistribute. This is where you will possible
>see routing loops.
>
> You can also create a tunnel interface on both EIGRP routers and share
>EIGRP info that way. This way they will both look like they are directly
>connected. Here's a possible config for the tunnel:
>
> (e0) r1(s0) -----(s0) r2(s1) -----(s0)r3(e0)
>
>r1 and r3 e0 interfaces are in the 172.16.0.0 address space
>All serial interfaces are in the 192.168.0.0 address space
>r1 and r3 are running eigrp
>r2 is running igrp with someone else
>
>r1:
>int e0
>ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0
>
>int tunnel 0
>ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
>tunnel source <r1 ip to r2>
>tunnel destination <r3 ip to r2>
>....
>....
>router eigrp 100
>network 172.16.0.0
>no auto
>
>r3:
>int tunnel 0
>ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0
>tunnel source <r3 ip to r2>
>tunnel destination <r1 ip to r2>
>
>router eigrp 100
>network 172.16.0.0
>no auto
>
>
>Kenny
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gerwin Boschloo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Luong, David'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Robert Padjen'"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 11:16 PM
>Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
>
>
> > EIGRP and IGRP are both Interior Gateway Protocols that are used inside
>a
> > AS. Therefore, when you want to connect different AS'es, you need an
> > Exterior Gateway Protocol like BGP. Within BGP you are routing to
>different
> > AS'es therefore the AS'es should be unique.
> >
> > Therefore: EIGRP AS 1 ---- IGRP AS 50 ---- EIGRP AS 1 will not
>work.
> >
> > Gerwin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luong, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:14 AM
> > To: 'Robert Padjen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: EIGRP contiguous AS
> >
> >
> >
> > If I remember correct, AS numbers do not have to be contiguous unless if
>you
> > want automatic redistributing between EIGRP and IGRP. If you have
>different
> > AS across boundaries then you will need to have to manually
>redistribute..
>.
> >
> > My $0.02...
> >
> > David Luong, CCNA,Network+,A+,i-Net+
> > Telecommunications Analyst
> > Insurance Corporation of B.C.
> > Vancouver, B.C CANADA
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Padjen [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 3:18 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: EIGRP contiguous AS
> >
> >
> > I have an interesting question for the group, although
> > it is not directly related to any of the current
> > exams.
> >
> > Does an EIGRP AS have to be contiguous or can it be on
> > two sides of an IGRP 'AS'. I note that the use of the
> > term AS is a mis-nomer for both protocols, but...
> >
> > For example, does:
> >
> > EIGRP AS 1 ---- IGRP AS 1 ---- EIGRP AS 1
> >
> > pose a problem?
> >
> > Does:
> >
> > EIGRP AS 1 ---- IGRP AS 50 ---- EIGRP AS 1
> >
> > My belief is that it could work, but it breaks the
> > concept of an AS and could lead to routing topology
> > table problems. Any takers?
> >
> > (I'll be working with my team in the lab, but thought
> > it was an interesting thought questions.)
> >
> > Nothing but net!
> >
> > =====
> > Robert Padjen
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://im.yahoo.com/ <http://im.yahoo.com/>
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html>
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > <http://www.groupstudy.com>
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>___________________________________
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>___________________________________
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
