[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Don't you divide the number of collisions by the number of > output packets to > get the rate?
Yes and then multiply by 100 to get a percent. Cisco's threshold is a percent. But I agree with the gist of your message. It's not a big deal if the result is 1.3%, even though Cisco's threshold is 0.1%. Priscilla > If so, 86548/6314935=0.013, which is pretty close > to .1 in my > book. > > Mark > > > > The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why > half-duplex. The > > Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to > the Wireless > > Bridge. > > I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said > the collisions > > are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate. > > Here's the output of sh interfaces e 0/0 > > > > Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0004.dd0d.5502 (bia > > 0004.dd0d.5502) > > Internet address is 172.20.1.2/24 > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, > > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set > > Keepalive set (10 sec) > > Half-duplex, 10BaseT > > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d20h > > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total > output drops: 0 > > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > > Conversations 0/5/256 (active/max active/max total) > > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > > Available Bandwidth 7200 kilobits/sec > > 5 minute input rate 53000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 8000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec > > 4528216 packets input, 642790340 bytes, 0 no buffer > > Received 176451 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 > throttles > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored > > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > > 6314935 packets output, 279254727 bytes, 0 underruns > > 59281 output errors, 86548 collisions, 0 interface resets > > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > > Thanks, > > > > neil > > > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Collisions go up normally with load. What is the load? > Could something > > else > > > (an attack or trojan horse or just excitement about your > terrific content) > > > have caused the load to go way up? > > > > > > Cisco says that no more than 0.1 percent of frames should > experience > > > collisions. How many frames have there been in the time > that the > > collisions > > > went up? How does that compare to your baseline? > > > > > > By the way, why do you have the interfaces set to half > duplex? Why don't > > you > > > set them them to full since it's a point-to-point link? > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > neil K wrote: > > > > > > > > One of my Cisco router's Ethernet interface connected to a > > > > Cisco Wireless > > > > Bridges has the interface collisions counter increasing > > > > rapidly. Over a > > > > period of 48 hrs the collision counter was 60,000 and the > > > > output error > > > > counter was more than 40000. Both the Ethernet interface > on the > > > > router and > > > > the Cisco Wireless bridge are set to 10/Half-duplex. > > > > There is nothing in between the bridge and the Router > Ethernet, > > > > connected by > > > > a cross-over cable. What could be causing this. > > > > > > > > Any comments, > > > > > > > > neil > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71282&t=71176 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
