I think the load balancing depends on the type of switching used in your
router if you issue no ip route-cache in the specific interfaces it will
turn off fast-switching and make load-balancing go by per-packet basis
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Benny Leong (HTHK - Senior Engineer II - iServices Development,
NNSD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 4:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Yee, Jason
Subject: RE: ip route
For the load balancing issue, is it based on load or based on round robin ?
Thanks.
----------
From: Yee, Jason [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 4:42 PM
To: 'Benny Leong (HTHK - Senior Engineer II - iServices
Development, NNSD)'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: ip route
It will do load balancing provided both links are of equal costs,
also the
type of routing protocols you used is also important
As for 2. I think it will stop routing thro 2.2.2.1 and fall back to
1.1.1.1
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
Benny Leong (HTHK - Senior Engineer II - iServices Development,
NNSD)
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ip route
Ip route 150.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 1.1.1.1
Ip route 150.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 2.2.2.1
Will these 2 statements :
1. perform load balancing ?
2. if the link to 2nd route fails, will the router stop routing
the
traffic through 2.2.2.1 ?
Thanks.
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
