Can you tell why a full routing tables is required ? What is the benefit ?
----------
From: John Kaberna [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 12:37 PM
To: Jeff Wang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
This will work no problem. I've done it at many sites. My minimum
recommended is exactly what you have.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Wang <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 9:17 PM
Subject: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
Hi all,
Just a quick question regarding 3640 with 128MB DRAM. Will
it be grunty enough to run full-BGP, talking to two different providers and
getting full routes, with one E1 2Mbps WAN link to each provider? What's
your minimum configuration from experience?
TIA,
Jeff Wang
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
Benny Leong (HTHK - Senior Engineer II - iServices Development, NNSD) Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:27:35 -0700

