|
I'll repost. This is the memory and BGP
summary from a router with the full route table.
The route table takes up less than 20 MB's.
The BGP router session is @ 39MB.
I'm not sure as to whether or not the table is
included in the session size.... I would
think it is...
#sho ip bgp sum
BGP router identifier xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, local AS number xxxxx BGP table version is 40912247, main routing table version 40912247 87050 network entries and 87129 paths using 11580494 bytes of memory 26531 BGP path attribute entries using 1380600 bytes of memory 11347 BGP AS-PATH entries using 286472 bytes of memory 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory 50 BGP filter-list cache entries using 600 bytes of memory Dampening enabled. 134 history paths, 139 dampened paths BGP activity 4499686/10692951 prefixes, 14624309/14537180 paths #sho proc mem Total: 111299776, Used: 70286204, Free: 41013572 PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process 2 0 16086660 25628 75188 0 0 CEF process 11 0 4040045016 4040012060 33632 0 0 IPC Seat Manager 20 0 1155320 1086196 13300 0 0 Net Background 38 0 115055424 1376452 16000 54540 0 IP Input 39 0 624368532 624367544 13848 0 0 IP SNMP 56 0 915859704 4592 14420 0 0 TCP Protocols 75 0 153157040 5489060 63376 147585240 148562508 Per-minute Jobs 76 0 6916776 0 6796 0 0 TCP Listener 79 0 3914308612 1073548112 60835916 0 0 BGP Router 80 0 662192 1005935144 6796 0 0 BGP I/O 81 0 21932 228366956 27960 0 0 BGP Scanner
|
Title: Cisco 3640 grunty enough for full-BGP routing?
