There are far better minds than mine, on this list , that defer to
www.cisco.com as the definitive resource , this makes complete sense for
obvious reasons. If you simply require an answer to your question I can
provide you with that and also a whole swag of logical arguements and
reasoning behind why I'm sure I'm correct. The thing is , I could be
wrong.... either way how do you benefit from it ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:02 AM
Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks.
>
>
> doesn't help. I tried before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing
book,
> ACRC book .. but can't found the answer.
>
>
> Ibam
>
> >
> > Try this
> > http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM
> > Subject: Single area with large number networks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hi, this question is really confuse me :
> > > What are two possible problems that can occur when a single OSPF area
> > > includes a large number of networks?
> > > a. more reachable errors
> > > b. frequent routing table recalculation
> > > c. frequent adjacencies table recalculation
> > > d. excessive link- state entries in the link- state table
> > > The frequent routing table recalculation is true, but what
> > about the other
> > > one ?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Ibrahim
> > >
> > >
> > > ********************************************
> > > Disclaimer:
> > > Please note that this correspondence is for the named person's use
only
> > and
> > > may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you
> > received
> > > this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your
> > system
> > > and notify the sender. Please ensure that you do not disclose, copy or
> > rely
> > > on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended
> > recipient.
> > > We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your assistance.
> > Please
> > > note that nothing in this correspondence shall be construed or
otherwise
> > > relied upon by the recipient as an offer, acceptance of an offer,
> > > representation, agreement or resolution of any kind.
> > > --------------------------------------------
> > > Copyright(C)Davnet Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2000
> > >
> > >
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
