thanks for your response.
But if some router down, the nearest one will send message to DR & BDR, and
DR will send multicast message (it won't be excessive) to its networks.
thanks,
Ibrahim
>
> IMHO, B is the best answer as link failures in the area will cause
> recalculations.
>
> D is a possible answer; however, "excessive" is a subjective word: OSPF
> will generate the number of LSAs necessary to build its tables and the
> picture of the network: it will not go beyond the number needed to do so.
> On the other hand, as a human, I may find a large number of LSAs
> "excessive".
>
> HTH,
>
> Charles
>
> D is kind of subjective, but it
> ""Ibrahim"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >
> > doesn't help. I tried before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing
> book,
> > ACRC book .. but can't found the answer.
> >
> >
> > Ibam
> >
> > >
> > > Try this
> > > http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM
> > > Subject: Single area with large number networks.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi, this question is really confuse me :
> > > > What are two possible problems that can occur when a single
> OSPF area
> > > > includes a large number of networks?
> > > > a. more reachable errors
> > > > b. frequent routing table recalculation
> > > > c. frequent adjacencies table recalculation
> > > > d. excessive link- state entries in the link- state table
> > > > The frequent routing table recalculation is true, but what
> > > about the other
> > > > one ?
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Ibrahim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ********************************************
> > > > Disclaimer:
> > > > Please note that this correspondence is for the named person's use
> only
> > > and
> > > > may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you
> > > received
> > > > this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your
> > > system
> > > > and notify the sender. Please ensure that you do not
> disclose, copy or
> > > rely
> > > > on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended
> > > recipient.
> > > > We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your
> assistance.
> > > Please
> > > > note that nothing in this correspondence shall be construed or
> otherwise
> > > > relied upon by the recipient as an offer, acceptance of an offer,
> > > > representation, agreement or resolution of any kind.
> > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > Copyright(C)Davnet Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2000
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
