Opinions vary , however my understanding is that this is a forum. "Why does
everyone need this mailing list"? I don't know that everyone does , I
participate because I enjoy it. You answered the rest yourself...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:31 AM
Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks.
>
>
> if you said refer to www.cisco.com, why everybody still need this
> mailing-list ? why there are many questions in this group ? Or better just
> simple make auto replay answer in this group "go to cisco website, you'll
> find the answer". :-)
>
>
>
> Ibrahim
>
> > There are far better minds than mine, on this list , that defer to
> > www.cisco.com as the definitive resource , this makes complete sense for
> > obvious reasons. If you simply require an answer to your question I can
> > provide you with that and also a whole swag of logical arguements and
> > reasoning behind why I'm sure I'm correct. The thing is , I could be
> > wrong.... either way how do you benefit from it ?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > doesn't help. I tried before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing
> > book,
> > > ACRC book .. but can't found the answer.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ibam
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Try this
> > > > http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM
> > > > Subject: Single area with large number networks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, this question is really confuse me :
> > > > > What are two possible problems that can occur when a single
> > OSPF area
> > > > > includes a large number of networks?
> > > > > a. more reachable errors
> > > > > b. frequent routing table recalculation
> > > > > c. frequent adjacencies table recalculation
> > > > > d. excessive link- state entries in the link- state table
> > > > > The frequent routing table recalculation is true, but what
> > > > about the other
> > > > > one ?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > Ibrahim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ********************************************
> > > > > Disclaimer:
> > > > > Please note that this correspondence is for the named person's use
> > only
> > > > and
> > > > > may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If
you
> > > > received
> > > > > this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from
your
> > > > system
> > > > > and notify the sender. Please ensure that you do not
> > disclose, copy or
> > > > rely
> > > > > on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended
> > > > recipient.
> > > > > We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your
> > assistance.
> > > > Please
> > > > > note that nothing in this correspondence shall be construed or
> > otherwise
> > > > > relied upon by the recipient as an offer, acceptance of an offer,
> > > > > representation, agreement or resolution of any kind.
> > > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > > Copyright(C)Davnet Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2000
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
>
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
