The answer is that on Cisco equipment, anyway, one can configure a static
route to go to a directly connected interface, or to any network that
appears in the routing table.
It looks like, in your case, you want something like this:
Router_C
i.p. route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 router_A_address ( since this is internet
traffic )
I am assuming router A then knows what to do with the traffic.
HTH
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Stull, Cory
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ip route question
I remember reading somewhere that when you add an IP route the ip address of
the next hop doesn't necessarily need to be the next hop or even on the same
subnet..?
Reason for asking
I want RouterC to have to go to RouterA before going out routerB to the
internet because routerA and routerB are on same ethernet segment with a
websense internet filter on that segment being used to filter internet
traffic. Right now RouterC traffic goes straight to routerB to
internet and doesn't get filtered through the websense filter.
Comments?
Thanks in advance as always.
Cory
(central site)
RouterA \
\
\
\
RouterB--------------------------------------------------------------------\
------------------------------------RouterC(remote site)
(central site) \
\
\
\
Internet
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
