Your message is probably being routed to the null interface for most of us 
because it's not comprehensible. Please use sentences, punctuation, and 
full words, i.e. "you" instead of "u." Please don't use all caps, though 
please do capitalize the first letter of a sentence. Those are the de facto 
protocols that we have generally agreed on in this forum to increase 
communications. I know I probably sound like a school teacher, but I am 
serious. We need these protocols in order to communicate effectively. 
Thank-you.

Priscilla

At 03:58 AM 3/1/01, SAIF wrote:
>well its not a terminology thing u see its understood when u use 100mbps 
>its then not
>csma/cd ethernet thing ,they made it like thre will be no collisions and 
>speed will be
>10 times than 10 mbps
>yes u r right on 36xx router there is full/half/auto duplex but u didnt 
>get the idea
>,its basically technology which is sensing which media is supported to 
>that interface
>,if it is 10mbps then interface will make it half duplex ethernet and 
>iffff it is 100mbs
>it will make it fast ethernet full duplex and u have choice to make it 
>half/full duplex
>by ur choice according to ur existing medium and toplogy
>THAT PORT MUST BE NOT A FASTETHERNET PORT  BUT IT CAN BE IF U USE IT IN 
>100MBPS WAY
>THERE IS ANOTHER THING YES IT IS POSSIBLEEEE I AGREE U CAN WORK 10BASE 
>T  (ONLY NOT
>COAXIAL) WITH FULL DUPLEX BUT THE THING IS THAT WHAT I WAS POINTING THAT 
>CISCO PRODUCTS
>USUALLY DONT SUPPORT    FULL DUPLEX WITH 10MBPS
>AM I WRONG ?????
>
>Neil Schneider wrote:
>
> > Sorry but you are incorrect.  (unless we just have a terminology difference
> > here) Just becuase you are running 100mbps. it is not automatically full
> > duplex.  the Fastethernet ports on routers (3640 seriesfor example) can be
> > set to full/half/auto duplex.  why bother with a half duplex setting if all
> > fastethernet is full duplex?
> >
> > --
> > Neil Schneider
> > MCT  MCSE  CCSI  CCNP
> >
> > "SAIF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > 100mbps is not ethernet be sure its fast ethernet ,also their is no
> > collisions in fast
> > > ethernet ,its colliision free and this is only possible if u have one way
> > to send and
> > > one way to recieve data simultaneously :) i am sure u got the idea
> > > secondly in ethernet there are collisions and if there are colliisions
> > Can u use one to
> > > send and one way to recieve simultaneously with collisions so if u cant
> > the result is
> > > ethernet works in half duplex mode and fast ethernnet works in full 
> duplex
> > > if u have any thing different than me plz share with us
> > > waiting ur reply
> > > Saif
> > >
> > > Neil Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is NOT true that ethernet is half and fastethernet is full duplex.
> > > > Either 10Mbps or 100Mbps ehternet can be run in half or full duplex
> > mode.
> > > > And offhand I don't know if the 2500 AUI port will do full ethernet.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Neil Schneider
> > > > MCT  MCSE  CCSI  CCNP
> > > >
> > > > "SAIF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > NO ITS ETHERNET PORT AND WORKING HALF DUPLEX ONLY ,U SEE CISCO GIVES
> > > > FASTETHERNET PORTS
> > > > > SPECIALLY IN THEIR ROUTERS SPECIALLY IN 4XXX SERIES AND U KNOW
> > ETHERNET
> > > > WORKS IN HALF
> > > > > DUPLEX AND FASTETHERNET WORKS IN FULL DUPLEX  SO THE RESULT IS AUI
> > PORT IS
> > > > HALF DUPLEX
> > > > > ETHERNET NOT AUTO SENSE AND IF U WANT AUTOSENSE 10/100 BASE T  GO TO
> > ANY
> > > > OTHER ROUTER
> > > > > ,CHECK THE ROUTER;S MANUAL :)
> > > > > HOPT IT WILL HELP
> > > > > IS IT ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Turfis wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is the Ethernet AUI port on the 2500 series Cisco routers Full
> > Duplex
> > > > > > compatible?  Does it autonegoiate?  Can you hard code the interface
> > for
> > > > > > half/full/auto?  Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _________________________________
> > > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________
> > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to