Which would solve the problem: e0 is down, s0.1 is set for ip unnumbered e0, so s0.1 is effectively down. Unless you only can have two interfaces on a router, never point an ip unnumbered interface at another interface that can go down unless you have a reason for it to go down when the numbered interface is down. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""martijn michiel"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > First thing that jumps into mind is why don't you define a loopback > interface with an ip address? > > Martijn > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Ruddy > Cordero > Verzonden: vrijdag 30 maart 2001 16:52 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: PAT > > > I have a frame relay circuit connected to a 1750 router with an = > ip-unnumbered assign to the serial int to point to the Ethernet = > interface. I shut down the Ethernet interface and configured a second = > serial interface on the router with the ip add. that is attached to a = > Cisco 2600 router. I also changed the ip unnumbered to point to that = > serial interface. I configured the 2600 to overload Nat and configured = > some static interfaces. My problem is: this 1750 is connected to the = > internet via frame relay and I'm unable to get any internet traffic to = > go pass the 1750. I create a static mapping for the DNS server we are = > using and I'm still no able to get no traffic. Need some advice from.... > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
