I used to get ticked off when someone would send annoying posts to the
list.....
Now I add the user's name to my kill file as soon as they get annoying...
This has increased my enjoyment of the list quite a bit....
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Congrats [7:4044]
Let me just say "well said and entertaining" kudos :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 19:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Congrats [7:4044]
"Q"
You're really quite a sad bloke aren't you.
Bullied at school???
Small man syndrome???
Anonymous e-mail must have been a big turning point in your life.
Get there first - then you're in a position to comment.
Can we take it that you've had a couple of bitter experiences because your
experience limited to a couple of pieces of Nortel/Riverstone and Cisco was
the requirement?
I've got an idea. You go back to your meal for one and your dirty magazine
and think about why you've never been able to get on with people.
I've just introduced you to a larger group of people than you will be used
to - My junk mail list.
Good-bye!
"A"
""Q"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Gee that's kinda like working at Microsoft as a Windowz architech and
> getting your MCSE! How hard can that be? Send me the CCIE's work resume
out
> side of the lab of Cisco, then i'll be impressed..See if you can manage
> Riverstone and Nortel equipment as well.....Well first you gotta survive
the
> Cisco layoffs. Bummer...heh..
>
> Q
>
> "Frank Kim" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm proud of you. Go Vietnamese! I'm taking my lab this November
> > also. I hope I will be the second Vietnamese person who will send out
> > such good news to the group.
> >
> > -Frank
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 May 2001, DUNG H. LE wrote:
> >
> > > May 7-8, 2001 - RTP Lab facility
> > >
> > > This was attempt 2. I changed my study habits from attempt 1, and
> therefore
> > > testing technique, for my attempt 2 (you perform like you
> > > practice..right?). It paid off. The change was to monotonously ping
> every
> > > interface IP / IPX address from every router. I made a list of the
> > addresses
> > > and ran through all of them from every router. I believe this lack of
> > > attention to detail is what did me in on attempt one.
> > >
> > > Time management was key. If I didn't know the config off the top of
my
> > > head, I skipped it. This allowed me to complete the entire day 1
> portion 3
> > > hours early. I had 4 areas that I needed to think about, so I saved
> them
> > > for last. I methodically approached each of the 4 areas, knocked out
> each
> > > requirement, and had 1 hour left to do the testing above. My strategy
> was
> > > that no matter what, I would take the last hour to test thoroughly, I
> just
> > > happened to get my 4 items done. Day 2 was the same way...although
only
> 3
> > > hours for the first part, I still had 45 minutes to test it all.
> > >
> > > Troubleshooting was by far the most nerve-racking experience. I had a
> > > "trouble ticket" list and was told to find as many problems as I could
> and
> > > document/fix them (one liners). Unexpectedly I had to troubleshoot a
> > > different network than the one I had spent a day and a half
configuring.
> 3
> > > hours was the time limit to learn a new topology, IP scheme, protocol
> > > intent, and then fix as much as possible. I don't feel like I was
ready
> > for
> > > this, and must have just kept calm enough to manage it.
> > >
> > > The waiting is a nerve killer. You wait before the lab starts about
an
> > hour
> > > for everything and everyone to get ready. You wait all night long for
> > > status on day 1's score. You wait after day 2 build out...1.5 hours
for
> > > me.... to find out if you made it to troubleshooting. Then you wait
> while
> > > they add up the points and spit a number out of the computer.... or
not.
> > > Howard ???? was the best!!! Comic relief goes a long way to ease my
> stress,
> > > and he delivered. I was very comfortable in the RTP environment.
> > >
> > > Study material used / frequency:
> > > Caslow 2nd edition - read it cover to cover once.
> > > Ccbootcamp labs - practiced daily (almost and minus weekends) for 4
> > > months.... 4-6 hours per day on a rack of equipment that was very
> similar
> > to
> > > the real thing. I was very comfortable with what was required of me
for
> > day
> > > 1 and 2 build out. In retrospect I would have practiced a bit more on
> > > troubleshooting. I was not comfortable with this at all and could
have
> > used
> > > some familiarity with strategy and tactic on this part.
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4202&t=4044
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]