Thanks for the info. That's a new one. Configuring auto negotiation 
actually fixed the problem! ;-)

Priscilla

At 04:51 PM 5/16/01, Keith Woodworth wrote:


>On Wed, 16 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
>|+On the bright side, your reliability is still 255/255, which makes sense
>|+since only 597 out of 530182 frames have an input error. The ratio of bad
>|+frames to good frames is 0.001, which is OK.
>
>One way to look at it. :)
>
>|+Is it copper cabling? Could there be electrical noise causing the errors?
>|+Is this server in a different location than the others? Did swapping the
>|+NIC reduce the rate? Perhaps the NIC outputs bad frames every so often.
>|+Please let us know what you find out. It will help us learn, though I
think
>|+the "bottom line" answer is that you shouldn't worry about this low level
>|+of errors.
>
>Yes standard TP. Server is located same rack as the others. One fellow
>from this group if I may mention him, as the last message was CC'd to the
>list: Brad McConnell mentioned he had some Linux machines with Intel
>EtherExpress cards connected to a 6509 switch. When he hard set the port
>on the card and the switch he saw errors as well. Soon as he Auto'd both
>the switch and the card in the computer all was well.
>
>As these are the same card but running under BSD/OS, I set a port to Auto
>on the switch, made sure the card was set to auto and moved the computer
>to that port, took about 15 secs but they autoed to 100/full.
>
>That was about a half hour ago and so far no errors:
>
>5 minute input rate 127000 bits/sec, 42 packets/sec
>   5 minute output rate 107000 bits/sec, 40 packets/sec
>      103937 packets input, 42817903 bytes
>      Received 1 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>      0 watchdog, 0 multicast
>      0 input packets with dribble condition detected
>      99082 packets output, 39561280 bytes, 0 underruns
>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
>      0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
>      0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
>      0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>
>Generally I would start seeing input errors within the first couple of
>megs of data. Looks like there might be issues with the driver for this
>card under BSD/OS and having the switch side pegged to 100/full and the
>card set to auto.
>
>Leave it be for now and see how it goes.
>
>Thanks for the reply.
>Keith


________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4790&t=4646
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to