I didn't see my original reply come through.
How about using multilink-group # under the interfaces
to bind them to a multilink interface?
Example:
int multilink1
ip address ...
encaps ppp
ppp multilink
...
int s1
multilink-group 1
int s2
multilink-group 1
int s3
multilink-group 1
As for PVCs and Frame Relay, haven't tried the above
method. But have done PPP over Frame Relay and
combined multiple PPP over Frame circuits into 1
multilink virtual template. It worked but I did it in
lab just to see if it could be done.
multilink-group doesn't work on DDR interfaces, this
was 12.1(5)T when the feature was introduced. It may
have changed since.
--- Kelly D Griffin wrote:
> Has anyone done this successfully and shown an
> increase in bandwidth? Has
> anyone done this with PVCs on the same router and
> frame port?
>
> Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Kg2 Network Design
> 877.418.4025
> http://www.kg2.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wojtek Zlobicki"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:54 PM
> Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
>
>
> > What is to be gained by using an inverse mux ?
> How much extra overhead is
> > caused by this rather than running in inversed
> mode?
> >
> >
> > ""Jon Wagner"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Take a look at this config and see if it work
> for you:
> > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/131/7.html
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Al Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:57 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
> > >
> > >
> > > Colleagues,
> > >
> > > I am currently trying to multiplex / bind 3
> parallel T1 clear channel
> > > circuits.
> > > The circuits will be terminating on a 7206
> router on an 8 port multi
> > > channel T1 card.
> > >
> > > My question is how do I bind the 3 T1s together
> to get the total
> aggregate
> > > bandwidth of 3 T1s.
> > > I have only found info on Inverse multiplexing
> for ATM which is not what
> I
> > > am trying to achieve.
> > > what I have is strictly 3 Point to Point T1
> circuits using PPP.
> > >
> > > Albert Smith
> > > Lucent Technologies
> > > System Engineer, CCNP MCSE
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ____________________________________________
> > http://1cis.com
> > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes
> > 1st Class Internet Solutions
> ____________________________________________
> http://1cis.com
> Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes
> 1st Class Internet Solutions
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5524&t=4625
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
