nothing wrong but its illogical
same route pointing to one host none of them will work if that host is down
so there is no point of safe side.. right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:12 PM
To: Farhan Ahmed
Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Here right now I am testing on only one interface, imagine If I have 10
WAN and 2 ethernet.. Then This kind of setting will be useful. We
generally follow it, so it was there.. What is the wrong in that ?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> what do u mean by safe side?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:04 PM
> To: Farhan Ahmed
> Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
>
>
>
> Nothing Actually second line is not required if we are defining the
> first. But it was defined on safe side.. some time we remove the routing
> after incresing the links..
>
> Thanks,
> Kiran
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
>
> > whats the diff bw these 2
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1
> > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
> > !
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:57 PM
> > To: Farhan Ahmed
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
> >
> >
> >
> > Sure. It is very simple configuration.
> >
> > 2610 Router:
> >
> > Current configuration:
> > !
> > version 12.0
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> > service timestamps log uptime
> > no service password-encryption
> > !
> > hostname Router
> > !
> > enable secret 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > enable password xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > ip domain-name xx.xxx
> > ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation ppp
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > shutdown
> > !
> > interface Serial0/1
> > ip address 192.168.1.61 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation ppp
> > no ip route-cache
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1
> > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > line con 0
> > transport input none
> > line aux 0
> > line vty 0 4
> > password xxxxxx
> > login
> > !
> > end
> >
> > Here I replaced the passwords and IP address ( Actually I am using
public
> > IP address, here I mention the private IP addresses).
> >
> > The very same is following on 2620 router also. Except one change. That
is
> > Ethernet is replaced with Fast ethernet.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kiran
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > > cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
> > > To: Farhan Ahmed
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working
> with
> > > the same configuration with other router with out any changes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kiran
> > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> > >
> > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1
route
> > to
> > > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc
> > > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your mail.
> > > >
> > > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in
that
> > > > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kiran
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan
it
> is
> > > > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway".
> > Then
> > > > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or
at
> > > least
> > > > specify a specific route to the other vlans)
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would
defiantely
> > want
> > > > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
> > > > > Hai,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in
my
> > > > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When
I
> am
> > > > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> > VLAN,
> > > > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I
use
> > > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> > > > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
> > > > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not
> the
> > > > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but
unable
> > to
> > > > > locate the solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > Kiran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13587&t=13497
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
