Yes I do. Thanks to all for your comments and help. It's always interesting to open a debate on a subject like this.
Regards, Charles. richard beddow wrote: > Mike, > > I have three final comments then I think enough has been said. > > 1. Ethernet has always been a half duplex standard until recent times, FDX > operation is always quoted therefore to make the distinction from the default. > > 2. Serial lines, however, since the late seventies-early eighties have been > by default a full duplex offering. Therefore FDX is assumed unless > otherwise stated. > > 3. My comments were not ment to offend but supposed to be funny. Humour on > a forum such as this is often missread and I should have learnt my leason > along time ago but I just can't help it. > > Charles do you have your answer??????? > > RB [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of cdowling.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28410&t=28270 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
