Seems like this list will always have someone, like this - Jason, where
every six months or so they will come along and downplay the CCIE cert. or
those that make $$$ from the CCIE cert. process. Whatever happened to that
biggest of ranter's - Mr. PKM??? I never heard Derek Small of fatkid.com
whine or complain about anything or anyone - HE JUST DID IT!
Jason, is it, remember talking s*** and doing it are two different
things! JUST DO IT!!! - quietly please : )
Just the other day I sold a PIX to a guy that told me he was going to
build a CCIE Security lab and put it online for everyone to use for FREE.
His eye's kind of glazed over when I pointed out the cost of building a full
lab, supplying a circuit and the monthly electrical bill for 24x7x365. That
was probably the least of his concerns since he claimed to be able to write
a 40 page lab in a single weekend and then sell it for a $1000. Although, I
thought he was going to cry because I wouldn't take a lousy $100 off the
price of the PIX!!!
With these type on individuals on the loose I have no worry about an
endless supply of work for me....I believe manager's call it - "Cleaning up
the corporate network." : )
Eric
PS - How many CCIE's on this list got there cert for little or no
cost$$$....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
> as an FYI, the fatkid labs are FREE
>
> www.fatkid.com
>
> many require just three or four routers plus frame switch. you can always
> use a hub or a mau instead of a switch.
>
> the Parkhurst BGP book has a LOT of GOOD practice using just three
routers.
>
> Much of Doyle can be accomplished with just a few routers.
>
> Imagination and resourcefulness are also free.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> c1sc0k1d
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
>
>
> Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till
> early next year. I'll let you know...
>
> The k1d
>
>
>
> ""Jason"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic
> > foundations:
> > 1. All labs should not exceed more than 6 routers.
> > I think we all know why this should be the case.
> > 2. The frame cloud in every lab should not exceed four connections.
> >
> > I have spoken to several people who complain about the
> > current competition use 5 connections in the frame cloud. Most of us
> > only have the four port
> > 2500 at home that acts as a frame switch.
> > 3. Keep it up to date.
> > How difficult is it to do a practice lab while trying not to
> > be distracted by some technology that is not on the test any more.
> > 5. Keep it original.
> > Create your own work, don't take a lab out of Halabi's book,
> > add an extra router, then slap a 650 dollar price tag on it.
> > 4. Keep it FREE.
> > I don't know about the rest if you, but after dropping
> > 13,000 dollars in a lab at home, and 4,000 dollars in training, spending
> > an extra 650 just hurts.
> >
> > I think my game plan is, at least for the first few labs, to create a
> > map in visio with some core requirements. Then the group can suggest
> > such things as Local Area
> > Mobility, NAT, etc that can be incorporated in to the lab.
> >
> > Where can we post the labs? Can every one read visio? Do we have to
> > send it out in a different format?
> >
> > And yes Marc, the email is bogus. I did not want to be spammed by you
> > or your affiliates.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29731&t=29682
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
