I couldn't subscribe to this project because to me the attitude of my study
partners is important.

The slamming of other people's work, obvious unapologetic mis-understanding
and misrepresentation of the issues and situation without first hand
knowledge doesn't bode well for a good learning environment.

I wish you well in your studies.

Kevin Wigle
CCDP CCNP and other stuff

----- Original Message -----
From: 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 21:11
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]


> !Hola!
>
> I'm very new to the Cisco Certs game, but I'd like this project.
>
> > Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic
> > foundations:
>
> >     1.  All labs should not exceed more than 6 routers.
> >             I think we all know why this should be the case.
>
> Somebody has said that in the real lab there are 6+3 routers.
>
> These 3 core routers are configured by the wannabe ccie or by the Cisco
> people?
>
> If they are configured by the cisco people and they are supposed to use
> only bgp we could set up several zebra/mrtd in internet with a system to
> automatically get bgp sessions configured...
>
> > I think my game plan is, at least for the first few labs, to create a
> > map in visio with some core requirements.  Then the group can suggest
> > such things as Local Area
> > Mobility, NAT, etc that can be incorporated in to the lab.
>
> > Where can we post the labs?
>
> I can setup a web server (not very good connectivity by US standards,
512kbps
> in Argentina...) to post them.
>
> > Can every one read visio?
>
> No. I don't think there is a visio reader for unix.
>
> > Do we have to send it out in a different format?
>
> PDF?
>
> Saludos,
> HoraPe
> ---
> Horacio J. Peqa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29727&t=29682
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to