Would this not also be a function of just what the ISP has/wants on the far
end?

My hookup uses a 3Com Accessbuilder 6100 I-Mux --- HSSI---Cisco 7200.  The
three T1's are inverse multiplexed on the 3Com.  Scaleable to 7 T1's.

'Couse this is a 'Cisco' newsgroup....

Best, G.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> What you want to look at is Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF). 
> It allows load
> balancing across multiple T1's. For each serial interface you 
> would have
> your own subnet (such as a /30) to your provider, because the serial
> interfaces cannot be on the same subnet. Turn on CEF using 
> "ip cef" globally
> (you may want to ensure you have a recent IOS, as CEF was 
> buggy early on).
> Then, on each serial interface, issue either "ip load-sharing 
> per-packet" or
> "ip load-sharing per-destination" depending on how you want the load
> distributed. To give you the full 4.5Mbps to any one site, 
> use per-packet
> load balancing.
> 
> James Willard, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> John Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599]
> 
> 
> I have a configuration question.
> I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one
> FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP.
> I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps)
> Would I run into issues
> 
> Here is my config.  Would this work?
> 
> 
> !
> hostname Cisco3620
> !
> !
> no ip name-server
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip domain-lookup
> ip routing
> !
> interface Ethernet 0/0
>  no description
>  ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
>  !
> interface Serial 0/0
>  no shutdown
>  ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.248
>  !
> interface Serial 0/1
>  no shutdown
>  ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.248
>  !
> interface Serial 1/0
>  no shutdown
>  ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.248
>  !
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/1
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1/0
> 
> !
> !
> ip classless
> no ip http server
> !
> end
> 
> 
> I tried this config with Cisco's config maker and I get IP 
> address errors on
> the serial ports, specifically being on the same subnet.
> Would this do basic aggregation?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33611&t=33599
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to