Fix your addressing, enable CEF and your set. If you like you can to per packet or per destination load sharing via CEF with the appropriate interface commands. Of coarse you can mess things up and encapsulate your serial interface PPP and use PPP multilink...
Dave John Jones wrote: > > I have a configuration question. > I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one > FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. > I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) > Would I run into issues > > Here is my config. Would this work? > > ! > hostname Cisco3620 > ! > ! > no ip name-server > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip domain-lookup > ip routing > ! > interface Ethernet 0/0 > no description > ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial 0/0 > no shutdown > ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial 0/1 > no shutdown > ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial 1/0 > no shutdown > ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.248 > ! > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/1 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1/0 > > ! > ! > ip classless > no ip http server > ! > end > > I tried this config with Cisco's config maker and I get IP address errors on > the serial ports, specifically being on the same subnet. > Would this do basic aggregation? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33612&t=33599 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
