Right, the remote router must also have ip cef capability. The cisco equipment was assumed since this is a Cisco group :). In case of no Cisco equipment on the far end, you can always just use static default routes as a previous post suggested. It will, however, not give you true load balancing.
James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hartnell, George" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:38 PM Subject: RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] > Would this not also be a function of just what the ISP has/wants on the far > end? > > My hookup uses a 3Com Accessbuilder 6100 I-Mux --- HSSI---Cisco 7200. The > three T1's are inverse multiplexed on the 3Com. Scaleable to 7 T1's. > > 'Couse this is a 'Cisco' newsgroup.... > > Best, G. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:33 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] > > > > > > John, > > > > What you want to look at is Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF). > > It allows load > > balancing across multiple T1's. For each serial interface you > > would have > > your own subnet (such as a /30) to your provider, because the serial > > interfaces cannot be on the same subnet. Turn on CEF using > > "ip cef" globally > > (you may want to ensure you have a recent IOS, as CEF was > > buggy early on). > > Then, on each serial interface, issue either "ip load-sharing > > per-packet" or > > "ip load-sharing per-destination" depending on how you want the load > > distributed. To give you the full 4.5Mbps to any one site, > > use per-packet > > load balancing. > > > > James Willard, CCNA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > John Jones > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:17 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Aggregate 3 T1's would this work. [7:33599] > > > > > > I have a configuration question. > > I have 3 dedicated T1's a router 3620 with three T1 CSU/DSU and one > > FastEthernet ports installed. All dedicated T's are from the same ISP. > > I want to aggregate the three T1's for increased bandwidth (4.5 Mbps) > > Would I run into issues > > > > Here is my config. Would this work? > > > > > > ! > > hostname Cisco3620 > > ! > > ! > > no ip name-server > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > no ip domain-lookup > > ip routing > > ! > > interface Ethernet 0/0 > > no description > > ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > interface Serial 0/0 > > no shutdown > > ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.248 > > ! > > interface Serial 0/1 > > no shutdown > > ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.248 > > ! > > interface Serial 1/0 > > no shutdown > > ip address 1.1.1.4 255.255.255.248 > > ! > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/1 > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1/0 > > > > ! > > ! > > ip classless > > no ip http server > > ! > > end > > > > > > I tried this config with Cisco's config maker and I get IP > > address errors on > > the serial ports, specifically being on the same subnet. > > Would this do basic aggregation? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33614&t=33599 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
