Tis a shame too. I ran a Vines network for about 8 years and have yet to
find a better protocol.


----- Original Message -----
From: "ko haag" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


> Same here, alot of my customers are still running most of these protocols
> and the only I
> have not seen in a while is Vines (to bad too, it was Better than
> Microsuck...sorry i
> meant soft.) :-P.
>
> David C Prall wrote:
>
> > Steven,
> > I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
> Vines,
> > DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't
seen
> > recently in the real world.
> >
> > David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
> >
> > > For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the R&S track
getting
> > > outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful,
not
> > as
> > > current.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > RFC 1149 Compliant.
> > >
> > >
> > > ""Persio Pucci""  wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> > > > How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
> > > >
> > > > tks!
> > > >
> > > > Persio Pucci - CCNP
> > > > UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36791&t=36682
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to