The 4000 and 6000 support 802.1x as of 6.2(1), and so does the 5000 Series
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4000/relnotes/ol_2117
.htm#xtocid14
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/relnotes/78_1123
5.htm#xtocid15

David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> nrf
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
>
>
> ""David C Prall""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > This is here now. It is called 802.1x and the operating system must
> support
> > it natively. The only operating system supporting it now is
> Windows XP and
> > .NET. Microsoft has made the statement that they will not be
> porting it to
> > Windows 2000. You'll remember a number of bugs back when XP
> Beta came out
> > and how switches VMPS/URT capable were choking on 802.1x packets. Cisco
> > switches are capable of supporting 802.1x now.
>
> Correction - SOME Cisco switches support 802.1x now, not all.  Most
> significantly, the 4000 and 6000 do not at this time.
>
> >
> > David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Wes Stevens
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:21 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > Ignore the MS bashers.
> > >
> > > There is at least a statement of direction that they will work with MS
> > > active directory. I don't know how far along it is. The idea is
> > > that when a
> > > user logs in the switch will setup the vlan on the port from the users
> > > active directory profile.
> > >
> > > For companies with users on MS platforms (and there are a few
> out there)
> > > this will have some big advantages. Vlan setup will get much
> easier and
> > > vlans will be much more secure.
> > >
> > > Can any Cisco people out there give us an idea on how far
> away this is?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Wow"
> > > >Reply-To: "Wow"
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]
> > > >Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:29:27 -0500
> > > >
> > > >brilliant
> > > >
> > > >""Patrick Ramsey""  wrote in message
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > Do you really want to trust the management of your core
> equipment to
> > > > > anything microsoft puts out?
> > > > >
> > > > > >>> "Mann, Chris"  04/01/02 04:05PM >>>
> > > > > Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from
> with Microsoft
> > > > > Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried
> > > looking on
> > > >CCO
> > > > > and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them
> > > >interact,
> > > > > if at all.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40323&t=40095
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to