That's interesting. I wonder why the commands are not available in my switch (a 6500 running 7.1). Hmmm...
""David C Prall"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The 4000 and 6000 support 802.1x as of 6.2(1), and so does the 5000 Series > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat4000/relnotes/ol_2117 > .htm#xtocid14 > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/relnotes/78_1123 > 5.htm#xtocid15 > > David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > nrf > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] > > > > > > ""David C Prall"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > This is here now. It is called 802.1x and the operating system must > > support > > > it natively. The only operating system supporting it now is > > Windows XP and > > > .NET. Microsoft has made the statement that they will not be > > porting it to > > > Windows 2000. You'll remember a number of bugs back when XP > > Beta came out > > > and how switches VMPS/URT capable were choking on 802.1x packets. Cisco > > > switches are capable of supporting 802.1x now. > > > > Correction - SOME Cisco switches support 802.1x now, not all. Most > > significantly, the 4000 and 6000 do not at this time. > > > > > > > > David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > Wes Stevens > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:21 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > > > > Ignore the MS bashers. > > > > > > > > There is at least a statement of direction that they will work with MS > > > > active directory. I don't know how far along it is. The idea is > > > > that when a > > > > user logs in the switch will setup the vlan on the port from the users > > > > active directory profile. > > > > > > > > For companies with users on MS platforms (and there are a few > > out there) > > > > this will have some big advantages. Vlan setup will get much > > easier and > > > > vlans will be much more secure. > > > > > > > > Can any Cisco people out there give us an idea on how far > > away this is? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Wow" > > > > >Reply-To: "Wow" > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] > > > > >Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:29:27 -0500 > > > > > > > > > >brilliant > > > > > > > > > >""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > Do you really want to trust the management of your core > > equipment to > > > > > > anything microsoft puts out? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> "Mann, Chris" 04/01/02 04:05PM >>> > > > > > > Can Cisco routers and switches be managed at all from > > with Microsoft > > > > > > Active Directory, or some Active Directory snap-in? I tried > > > > looking on > > > > >CCO > > > > > > and Microsoft.com but did not see too much on how the two of them > > > > >interact, > > > > > > if at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40418&t=40095 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
