Dain Deutschman wrote: > One of the choices in the question was 16....but 14 was not a > choice. Could > it be that since 14 was not a choice that 8 was the closest > thing since 16 > is possibly wrong because of the 0 subnet? This seems a little > off the wall > to me but....sometimes those cisco questions are off the wall. > Dain.
But couldn't you use that same logic and say 16 was the closest since 8 is wrong and 14 wasn't an answer? I still say 16 is the answer. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48406&t=48367 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
