ah come on, guys, now you're all trying to outsmart yourselves. nothing in the RFC's regarding CIDR / summarization mentions a "subnet zero" why should it? that would defeat the purpose of CIDR/summarization.
""Dain Deutschman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > One of the choices in the question was 16....but 14 was not a choice. Could > it be that since 14 was not a choice that 8 was the closest thing since 16 > is possibly wrong because of the 0 subnet? This seems a little off the wall > to me but....sometimes those cisco questions are off the wall. Dain. > > ""Bob Timmons"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Firstly, 2 to the power of 4 is 16 (2x2x2x2). > > > > Secondly, regarding Carl's post, would the answer be 14? I'm not sure the > > subnet-zero comes into play with CIDR. I was under the impression it was > > only relevant to subnetting as opposed to summarizing. Does anyone know > for > > sure? > > > > > I say 8. 2 to the power of 4 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48413&t=48367 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
