I think it is ur misconfiguration on the interfaces. In fact, OSPF will not need a 'backbond' is there is only one area.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:18:45 GMT "John Brandis" wrote: > I have the following error whilst playing with OSPF > > 12:52:40: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID, from > backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 10.1.4.20, Ethernet0 > > I have 2 routers, Router A and Router B, back to back. Able to get the 2 > connected, however when I > (Router A) > router ospf 20 > network 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.0 area 20 > > (RouterB) > router ospf 20 > network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 area 20 > > Should I define different areas ? > > Thanks for your time > > John > > > ********************************************************************** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > ********************************************************************* > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > ********************************************************************* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48668&t=48463 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
