Kathe Saccenti would be an excellent choice. This group, indeed any group, would be honored by her participation. She is the smartest most personable most terrific ever!!!!!!!!
( let's see if sucking up gets me a couple of points next time I'm in the CCIE Lab ;-> ) -- z ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > nah, you dont want them as hosts... > > Howard and Priscilla would never stop talking. They would be just way to > helpful and feel too bad when people got booted off the show. Not to > mention, neither are CCIEs. :) > > Jeff would have to recertify as only active CCIEs would be allowed on the > show!! > > To make the show spicy, my vote for the hosts: Scott Morris and Paul > Borghese > > For the critics: Brian Dennis, Kathryn Saccenti, Lou Rossi > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Priscilla Oppenheimer, Howard Berkowitz, and Jeff Doyle > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Viera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 28 August 2002 14:37 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > Who would be the hosts?????????????:) > > ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > they need to keep the number for CCIE's less than 10,000. they should > > > so > > a > > > "squeeze" and change everyone's #. then, when it start to get closer > > > to 10,000 again, we have a contest like American Idol, call it > > > Worldwide > > IEdol > > > instead. have them program routers and solve technical problems in > > > front > > of > > > a live audience. everyone could then go to groupstudy and vote for who > > they > > > want to kick off the show!!! > > > > > > thanks, > > > -Brad Ellis > > > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > > > Network Learning Inc > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > > > Voice: 702-968-5100 > > > FAX: 702-968-5104 > > > > > > ""Moffett, Ryan"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Well, the online verification system says that "Stuart Biggs" is > > > > CCIE > > > 1025, > > > > though the current status is Inactive. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:22 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote > > > > [7:52165] > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) > > was/is > > > > Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. > > > > > > > > This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned > > > > as > > > CCIE > > > > #1025. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Daniel Cotts" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM > > > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote > > > [7:52159] > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding > > > > > the > > > > first > > > > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the > > > > > quoted > > > post > > > > > below he does provide a name. > > > > > snip > > > > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is > > > > > that > > > his > > > > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I > > > > > took > > the > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The > > > > > lab > > > > itself > > > > > had > > > > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - > > > > > kind > > of > > > > an > > > > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > > > > unsnip > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and > > > > > > it's > > our > > > > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at > > > > > > networkers in Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and > > > > > > about 100 of us took the test and only 2 passed. He chuckled > > > > > > stating his intention was to > > make > > > > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > > > > confusion as > > > > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > > > > some have retired, > > > > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last > > > > > > > time > > I > > > > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > > > > 8031 active > > > > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > > > > tested by CCIE > > > > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test > > > > > > > candidates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52244&t=52146 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
