Mike Martins wrote: > > Priscilla > Thanks for that. Years in IP and I am clueless about IPX. > Reason why I was using my own x.x.x was for a easy number to > remember for the frame relay map statements on opposite ends.
Oh, that makes sense. > (I looked at practise labs - that is what they wuz using) > I am still befuddled why on one router it takes the command and > on another it does not. Maybe I typed in 2.2.2 wrong. They can't both be 2.2.2, you realize, don't you? In other words, two ends of a serial link, which would both be on the same network number, can't both use 2.2.2, because, if they did, they would have duplicate network-layer addresses. You probably realize that... Are both routers running the same version of IOS? Mabye they changed something. You never know. > Maybe I > should try it more gently this time. > Stuff this, I am moving onto the BGP lab tonight.. Sounds like a plan. BGP is way more important. ;-) Let us know what you find out with the IPX issue. though. Thanks. _______________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54001&t=53989 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
