""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> that's the best command to show the output
>
CL: unfortunately, as the following output indicates, even when all packets
were being dropped ( apparently ) there was no indication of this.
Router_1#sh policy int s 0
Serial0
Service-policy output: 200filter (1289)
Class-map: pingr5 (match-all) (1291/2)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip precedence 5 (1295)
police:
8000 bps, 1500 limit, 1500 extended limit
conformed 0 packets, 0 bytes; action: transmit
exceeded 0 packets, 0 bytes; action: drop
conformed 0 bps, exceed 0 bps violate 0 bps
Class-map: pingr6 (match-all) (1299/3)
876 packets, 73152 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip precedence 6 (1303)
police:
8000 bps, 1500 limit, 1500 extended limit
conformed 60 packets, 7872 bytes; action: transmit
exceeded 0 packets, 0 bytes; action: drop
conformed 0 bps, exceed 0 bps violate 0 bps
Class-map: pingr7 (match-all) (1307/4)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: ip precedence 7 (1311)
police:
8000 bps, 1500 limit, 1500 extended limit
conformed 0 packets, 0 bytes; action: transmit
exceeded 0 packets, 0 bytes; action: drop
conformed 0 bps, exceed 0 bps violate 0 bps
Class-map: class-default (match-any) (1315/0)
19228 packets, 27705238 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any (1319)
Router_1#
> --
>
> RFC 1149 Compliant.
>
>
>
> ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Chuck's Long Road wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm putting in some rack time to review certain QoS features.
> > > > Configuration
> > > > is not really a problem. MQC makes this really easy :->
> > > >
> > > > However, I am attempting to observe results, and I am finding
> > > > that I am
> > > > unable to make bad things happen, such as packet drops.
> > > >
> > > > I am pinging from three different routers on a token ring to 3
> > > > other routers
> > > > via a 64K frame relay. The router that bridges the token ring
> > > > and frame
> > > > networks has the policy configured.
> > >
> > > You would have to exceed 64 Kbps for drops to occur, wouldn't you? Do
> you
> > > have any idea how much bandwidth you're using on the Token Ring side?
> What
> > > does show int show for load?
> > >
> > > I'm thinking you'll need to do more than ping. The problem with
Cisco's
> > ping
> > > is that it doesn't let you specify how much time between pings,
> sometimes
> > > called an interval. The timeout value is for unsucessful pings. But
what
> > you
> > > need is a configurable interval between the sending of pings,
> successful
> > or
> > > not. A real operating system or real ping tool would let you do this.
> ;-)
> >
> >
> > CL: I finally was able to get some bad things to happen.
> >
> > token ring domain---- border router ----- frame relay domain
> >
> > I just started pinging from both sides, over an extended period of time.
> To
> > judget from the result, given the rudimentary configurations, it takes a
> > minute or two for the rate limits to apply. There is an "average"
traffic
> > rate.
> >
> > three routers from each domain pinging the other side, packet sizes 1500
> > bytes, and I lowered the timeout value to 1 second from the default two
> > seconds. By the time I added the sixth router's traffic, everybody
started
> > timing out. It took a minute or two for traffic to start going through
> again
> > after I stopped traffic from a router or two. I'll have to look into the
> > defaults more closely.
> >
> > There has got to be a better show command than the "show policy-map
> > interface etc" for this.
> >
> > Back to the docs.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Ping in the MS-DOS prompt on Windows doesn't have this either, at
least
> > not
> > > the version I'm using. But ping under UNIX does, although it may not
let
> > you
> > > set the interval low enough. Some UNIXes have a -f (flood) option that
> > will
> > > let you really whip the pings out. And a ping utility would let you do
> > that
> > > too. For example, I use iNetTools from WildPackets.
> > >
> > > Are you trying to consume bandwidth just by using router tools or
could
> > you
> > > use a host also? Then there are many more options, of course.
> > >
> > > Hmm, what are some other ways to consume bandwidth by just configuring
> > > router options. Gazillions of SAPs? Gazillions of AppleTalk networks
> with
> > > RTMP? Can you FTP or RCP stuff to and from the routers?
> > >
> > > _______________________________
> > >
> > > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> > > www.priscilla.com
> > >
> > > >
> > > > class-map match-all pingr6
> > > > match ip precedence 6
> > > > class-map match-all pingr7
> > > > match ip precedence 7
> > > > class-map match-all pingr5
> > > > match ip precedence 5
> > > > !
> > > > policy-map 200filter
> > > > class pingr5
> > > > police 8000 1500 1500 conform-action transmit
> > > > exceed-action drop
> > > > class pingr6
> > > > police 8000 1500 1500 conform-action transmit
> > > > exceed-action drop
> > > > class pingr7
> > > > police 8000 1500 1500 conform-action transmit
> > > > exceed-action drop
> > > > !
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial0
> > > > bandwidth 64000
> > > >
> > > > ( clockrate on the frame switch is set to 64K )
> > > >
> > > > ip address 192.168.50.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > ip ospf priority 100
> > > > service-policy output 200filter
> > > > no fair-queue
> > > > frame-relay map ip 192.168.50.2 102 broadcast nocompress
> > > > frame-relay map ip 192.168.50.3 103 broadcast nocompress
> > > > frame-relay map ip 192.168.50.4 104 broadcast nocompress
> > > > !
> > > >
> > > > I'm using extended ping, and setting the packet size to 1500,
> > > > and the ToS
> > > > bit to match the values in the class-maps.
> > > >
> > > > Replies appear to be slow, but nothing is being dropped, as I
> > > > would expect.
> > > > Even when I throw in traffic from the border router just to
> > > > fill up
> > > > bandwidth.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone got some thoughts on "proof of concept" for policing?
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > www.chuckslongroad.info
> > > > like my web site?
> > > > take the survey!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54156&t=54134
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
