""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Pris, > > In our 6509's we used to make the native vlan and the data vlan > the same and it was something other than 1...if a blade fails and > we put in a new one , it defaults to vlan 1 for all ports. If the > blade has trunk ports in it, they get set to native vlan 1. The other > end is set for something else, this resulted in vlan mismatch in the vtp > domain, and in a lot of instances we suffered stp recalcs that took > buildings down for periods of time...we subsequently have returned to > making native vlan 1 on all trunks and have not had any issues since.. >
CL: idle curiousity. as an alternative, can't the replacement blades be preconfigured on another box, then moved to the box in question? this is not meant as a snide remark, or a negative criticism. I think what you are demonstrating is a well known phenomenon, where people back off / out of good ideas and good practice as a matter of expedience and convenience. (And yes, I have been known to have backed off requiring password changes every 30 days because I got tired of, every 30 days, going from user to user to help them log in using a new password.) > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems Inc. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:49 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743] > > > > > > Larry Letterman wrote: > > > > > > vlan mismatches and major spanning tree recalcs.. > > > > Why? Thanks for any more detail you can give. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > > Network Engineer > > > Cisco Systems Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > Behalf Of > > > > Azhar Teza > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:21 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743] > > > > > > > > > > > > When Ports are configured as trunk in Catalyst switches, they > > > still belong > > > > to VLAN 1 in native column eventhough the ports can span all > > > > VLANs. What's > > > > the drawback of changing the port from Native VLAN 1 to some > > > other VLANs? > > > > Regards, Teza > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com > > > > The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55776&t=55743 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
