Cil, here is a working config from a 2611 router in my lab.

interface Ethernet0/1
 no ip address
 full-duplex
!
interface Ethernet0/1.1
 encapsulation dot1Q 121
 ip address 122.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1.2
 encapsulation dot1Q 122
 ip address 122.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1.3
 encapsulation dot1Q 123
 ip address 122.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1.4
 encapsulation dot1Q 124
 ip address 122.1.4.1 255.255.255.0
!

on the switch side I have the switchport configured as a vlan tunnel, but in
your situation I believe you want the switchport configured as a dot1q
trunk.


the IOS is 12.1.5T10, but yes you do need an image that support dot1q. not
al images do.

HTH

Chuck

--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"




""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I mentioned in
> previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN trunking on the darn 2600
> router!
>
> When we do:
>
> int fa0/0
> no ip address
> int fa0/0.1
> encapsulation dot1q 100
>
> The router claims that the "encapsulation" is invalid input.
>
> When we tried to do the IP address first, it says:
>
> Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that
> subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10, IEEE 802.1Q,
> or ISL vLAN.
>
> (That makes it sound like VLAN trunking is supported!?)
>
> IOS version is 12.1(5).
>
> He's using the Firewall Feature Set (CBAC stuff) es evidenced by "ip
> inspect" commands in his config.
>
> Does it not support VLAN trunking??
>
> I've asked him to do "show flash" and "show version" so we can get more
> info. What else should I ask for? THANKS
>
> Priscilla




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59851&t=59850
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to