In router A the intf is configured as serial 0/0.2 point-to-point (frame-relay) In router B the intf is configured as a normal frame-relay intf I have issued a show ip ospf interface And in both routers the network type is point-to-point So there is no need for me to force the ip ospf network point-to-point Do you agree with this ? Thanks for your help, BF ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Bruno Fernandes"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > OK Rookie question > > > > > > I have 2 routers connected with a PPP link (serial) > > > > Router A in area 0 > > Router B in area 20 > > > > I have several loopback interfaces in Router B area 20 and announced as > > area 20, I have configured the loopback interfaces with C class > > addresses. But when I issue a show ip route in Router A I think I should > > see the network announced with a class C mask but it appears with host > > mask. > > > > I have tried with EIGRP and everything appears to be normal. > > > > Do I need to summarize in Router A ? > > > > Any ideas? > > > > This is the way it is supposed to work. Out of the box, without > intervention, loopbacks are considered stub hosts in the OSPF world. > > The intervention which corrects this is the command ip ospf network > point-to-point, a knob that was added in 12.x seemingly for the purpose of > giving CCIE Lab candidates a break. ;-> > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > BF &i=60343&t=60342 > -------------------------------------------------- > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60346&t=60342 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
