The message format is FACILITY-SEVERITY-MNEMONIC.  So this is a message from
the BGP Facility, the severity indicates functionality may be affected, and
the message identifier is 'Notification.'  In this case the Error Code is 2
(Open) and the SubCode is 7 (Unsupported Capability - see RFC2842).

The only time I've seen this is when there is an address-family mismatch,
i.e., one peer is ipv4 only, one peer is vpnv4 with ipv4-unicast disabled,
specifically when configuring MPLS VPNs using MBGP, but I'd expect you'd see
the same message if you had any sort of address family (or other optional
capability) mismatch.

Of course, I don't have a PhD, nor my CCIE # yet, so I may not actually be
worthy of the response I've typed.

Best Regards,

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]


> hey,
>
> %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7
>
> BGP-3 means it's a BGP UPDATE message error
> 2/7 are the error subcodes (I believe!)
> 2- unrecognized well known attribute
> 7- AS Routing loop
>
> take a closer look at your configs, etc... is it possible you've got a
loop
> on your hands?
>
> hope this helps,
> Charles
>
>
>
> ""Amr Essam""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Dear all
> >
> > I have been receiving this msg in all my routers during the past month
> > and I have searched on how I can remove it but I didn't have any luck to
> > find anything can tell on how to remove this entry to appear in my log
> > The entry is:
> >
> > %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint
> > capability) 0 bytes
> >
> > I hope I can find some advice on how to remove this entry to appear in
> > my router logs
> >
> > Regards
> > Amr




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60392&t=60338
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to