s vermill wrote:
> 
> s vermill wrote:
> > 
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > > 
> > > s vermill wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Larry Letterman wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > In most cases you will only re-write the source mac
> > address
> > > > > when traversing
> > > > > across a L3 device. 
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think that's so.  
> > > 
> > > Did you misplace your comment? 
> > 
> > No.  I disagree that a source MAC re-write would be all that
> > takes place when crossing a L3 device.  Host A, sending to an
> > off-subnet Host B, would use its own MAC as the source and the
> > L3 device interface MAC as the destination.  The L3 device
> > strips both at ingress.  If, in fact, the destination is on a
> > directly attached shared medium, the source MAC is re-writen
> to
> > that of the egress interface.  The destination MAC is whatever
> > the L3 device has in the ARP cache for Host B.  Both source
> and
> > destination MACs change when crossing a L3 device.  Doesn't it
> > sound like Larry is saying that the source MAC is all that
> > changes and not the destination MAC?  Or maybe I just took
> that
> > wrong?
> 
> I think that maybe Larry was saying that the only time it would
> be *necessary* to change the source MAC is when traversing a L3
> device.  

That's how I read it. (He was comparing it to a L2 device.) The word "only"
is an evil word that editors hate. :-)

P.

> He isn't necessarily saying that only the source MAC
> would change when crossing one.  Sorry Larry.  I think that was
> a mis-read on my part.
> 
> > 
> > I think his first comment is
> > > correct, but then a following one is strangely worded. See
> > below
> > > 
> > > > A host will have an ARP cache entry
> > > > for its gateway.  That would be the destination MAC.  The
> > > > source MAC would be that of the sending host itself. 
> Using
> > > its
> > > > own ARP cache, the gateway would re-write both the source
> > and
> > > > destination MAC if the destination was, in fact, directly
> > > > attached to (or reachable via) another Ethernet
> interface.
> > > > If
> > > > not, and the packet needed to cross some serial WAN link,
> > both
> > > > MACs would simply be stripped off.  Every L3 device strips
> > off
> > > > source and dest. MAC at ingress.  Whether or not a new
> > source
> > > > and dest. MAC is encapsulated around the IP packet depends
> > on
> > > > whether or not the destination is reachable via another
> > > > Ethernet interface.
> > > 
> > > Or Token Ring, FDDI, LocalTalk. :-)
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > If you go across a layer 2 network, all
> > > > > the mac address's
> > > > > would typically be part of the same broadcast domain and
> > not
> > > > > need to be changed.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you go across a T1 or Frame it will still be mapped
> to
> > or
> > > > > have an assigned IP Address
> > > > > that constitutes a layer 3 hop and write its mac address
> > in
> > > > > the frame.
> > > 
> > > Here's where he went astray. As I mentioned earlier, a
> serial
> > > interface doesn't have a MAC address and the data-link-layer
> > > protocols used across serial interfaces don't have MAC
> > > addresses in them.
> > > 
> > > The sentence isn't parsable, (sorry Larry!) but may indicate
> > > some additional misunderstanding.  The fact that the next
> hop
> > > has a Layer 3 address isn't of major significance when
> talking
> > > about forwarding traffic and the addresses that end up in
> the
> > > forwarded packet. The IP addresses don't change end-to-end.
> > MAC
> > > addresses on LANs change, hop by hop. WANs don't have MAC
> > > addresses.
> > > 
> > > Yes, routing protocols exchange next hop info using IP
> > > addresses. So, if we're considering Ethernet, at some point
> > the
> > > source router must have found out the MAC address of the
> > > destination router using ARP. The router will put its own
> MAC
> > > address in the source field and the destination (next hop)
> > > router's MAC address in the destination field.
> > > 
> > > In the case of a T1 point-to-point link, a MAC address isn't
> > > necessary since it's not a shared medium and there's no need
> > to
> > > identify which station should receive the frame. There is
> only
> > > one other station!
> > > 
> > > Now, Frame Relay is shared "in the cloud." The DLCI would
> help
> > > the L2 switches in the cloud forward the frame correctly.
> > > Inverse ARP would help the router map a L3 next hop address
> to
> > > a DLCI, if I understand it correctly.
> > > 
> > > Priscilla
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > However if I am wrong here, Priscilla or Howard or Chuck
> > > > > will let me know...:)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Larry Letterman
> > > > > Network Engineer
> > > > > Cisco Systems
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Cisco Newbie" 
> > > > > To: 
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:42 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: MAC Address [7:62251]
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > First, thanks for all that responded.  One
> clarification
> > > > > that I need address
> > > > > > is the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I cross a L3 router and the outgoing interface is
> > > > > something other than
> > > > > > Ethernet, will the L2 frame show a new MAC address? 
> In
> > > > > other words, if my
> > > > > > outgoing interface is say T1 PPP or even a dial-up,
> > should
> > > > > I be seeing a new
> > > > > > MAC address?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it only when I cross a L3 device AND my outgoing
> > > > > interface is a share
> > > > > > medium like Ethernet that a new MAC address will be
> > placed
> > > > > on the frame?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62378&t=62251
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to