At 6:19 PM +0000 2/19/03, Vicky Rode wrote:
>comments in-line:
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Kelly Cobean
>Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:54 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Does MLS (Layer 3 switching) require VLANs? [7:63147]
>
>
>Priscilla,
> Ok, you caught me not telling the whole truth. There is a second VLAN
>on the switch, but my point was that the MLS cache is full of entries for
>one host talking to another host off of the same VLAN interface but on a
>secondary subnet, indicating that L3 switching (routing) took place for that
>data-flow...So now I guess there are two hands clapping ;-) You sure do
>keep us all on our toes!!! Thanks!
>-----------------------------
>that's because packet switching between subnets using secondaries are
>process-switched.
On general IOS -- can't speak to the switch implementations -- you can code
ip route-cache same-interface
ipx route-cache same-interface
and get fast switching for secondaries. Don't know if there is a way
for CEF to figure this out.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63385&t=63147
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
