>How do you nag a packet? Infact, is it not an oxymoron? How would you feel if you were a packet confronted with a debug log and a demand to explain
> >To nag is to continually pester or annoy, yet a packets lifetime is >normally measured in milliseconds, therefore she must be one hell of a >nagger! Trust me. I don't even need to measure Radia; my grandmother had a latency-to-nag beyond the capabilities of measuring equipment. For a different cultural reference, consider the propagation time of a reference implementation Greek ship whose launching is triggered by the application of one milliHelen of face. Histories reveal no latency in such launching once the face is applied, so perhaps this is a lost technology for getting around lightspeed restrictions. > >Ok, it's late, I'll stop. > >Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63817&t=63728 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
