>Howard, > >Why in the world would Cisco start at 92001 for the CCSI? Any >particular reason for such a high number?
First CSSI in 1992. I was the fifth in 1993. > >Now we all know for a fact why the CCIE # start at 1025? > >So > > >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833] > >Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:04:28 GMT > > > > >Howard > > >CSSI 93005 > > > > > > > > > > > >Howard, > > >If you were a Cisco Instructor years ago, is it safe to assume the CSSI > > >number started at 93000?? Just curios. > > > >92001, I believe. Not sure. > > > > >On a serious note, are you allowed to still add the cert and number > > >after your name if you become inactive? > > > >No one ever really came up with a good set of rules. Recertification > >was never as well defined as it was with CCIE and the like. I have no > >problem in saying "inactive" -- the irony being that I'm currently on > >a subcontract developing internal courseware for Cisco staff. > > > >Since a CSSI is not all that meaningful except in the context of a > >training partner, the active-versus-inactive distinction isn't that > >significant -- if you are doing approved Cisco training, it will be > >active with the partner; if you aren't, it won't. It's not as if you > >can go into business as a Cisco instructor just by having a CSSI. >Add photos to your messages with MSN >8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64866&t=64833 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
