seeing as the CCSI number uses only 2 digits for the date field, did the program implode as Y2K came and went? ;->
-- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > Howard, > > > > Why in the world would Cisco start at 92001 for the CCSI? Any > > particular > > reason for such a high number? > > I think CCSI uses hierarchical addressing unlike the flat addressing used > for CCIE. :-) > > Also, to answer someone else's question, I think you get to keep your number > (and use it?) indefinitely. I'm 96110, the 110th one in 1996. Must have been > a good year. > > But as Howard has said, you can't really use the number and be an active > CCSI unless you are currently employed at a Cisco Certified Learning Partner > (or employed at Cisco itself.) > > My guess is that if you were inactive for a while and then went to a new > learning partner, you would have to go through a barrage of tests again, but > probably keep your number. But I don't know for sure.... Maybe if the > economy ever picks up again there will be a lot of people trying to get an > answer to that question. Not looking good for now, though. > > By the way, did y'all see this excellent article about teaching in TCP > Magazine. It's called "So You Wanna Teach." The comments on the article are > worth reading too. > > http://www.tcpmag.com/linkstate/article.asp?EditorialsID=135 > > _______________________________ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com > > > > > > Now we all know for a fact why the CCIE # start at 1025? > > > > So > > > > >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > > >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: General comments on Cisco > > Teaching > > [7:64833] >Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:04:28 GMT > > >Howard > > > >CSSI 93005 > > > > > > > > > >Howard, > >If you were a Cisco Instructor years > > ago, is it > > safe to assume the CSSI > >number started at 93000?? Just > > curios. > > > >92001, I believe. Not sure. > > >On a serious note, are you > > allowed to > > still add the cert and number > >after your name if you become > > inactive? > > > >No one ever really came up with a good set of rules. > > Recertification > > >was never as well defined as it was with CCIE and the like. I > > have no > > >problem in saying "inactive" -- the irony being that I'm > > currently on >a > > subcontract developing internal courseware for Cisco staff. > > > >Since a > > CSSI is not all that meaningful except in the context of a > > >training > > partner, the active-versus-inactive distinction isn't that > > >significant > > -- if you are doing approved Cisco training, it will be >active > > with the > > partner; if you aren't, it won't. It's not as if you >can go > > into > > business as a Cisco instructor just by having a CSSI. > > > > > > >Message > > Posted at: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64854&t=64833 > > >-------------------------------------------------- >FAQ, list > > archives, > > and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65007&t=64833 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
