Peter Bonivart wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
<ch...@westnet.com> wrote:
IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side.

Opensource projects exist for the developers to get the software they need,
faster, through colaboration with others. If anyone else finds it usefull
that's an added bonus. But if no one other than the devs use it themselves,
the project has fullfilled it's purpose.

Adding business value is the job of the distros, or Apple if they include
it, or myself as an ISP. That's why I said before I think the real let-down
here are the distros that didn't do anything about it.

Extreme ? Maybe, but that's why I use open-source, for getting best of
breed, newest, breaking with history when needed.

This would be ok if the distros maintained the servers which their distributed version of Clamav updated from.

They don't. The responsibility in this case is that of those who maintain Clamav, not the distros.

I would suggest that distros may want to take note of this situation; its perhaps not unreasonable for them to maintain eg their own Clamav update servers.



--
Please remember that an email is just like a postcard; it is not confidential nor private nor secure and can be read by many other people than the intended recipient. A postcard can be read by anyone at the mail sorting office and expecting what is written on it to be private and secret is not realistic. Please hold no higher expectation of email.

If you need to send confidential information in an email you need to use encryption. PGP is Pretty good for this.
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to