Edit and remove -Wno-logical-op-parentheses -Wno-dangling-else libclamav/Makefile.am libclamav/Makefile.in libclamav/Makefile libclamunrar/makefile What version of zlib are you using? IIRC the reason I updated to Zlib-1.2.11 was for decompressing the signatures This will also have to be placed in a non standard location so it doesn't interfer with OS specific utilities. Seems like you need a recent version of openssl.
novpenguincne via clamav-users wrote: > So after some research, I tried removing the > "wno-logical-op-parenthesis" and "wno-dangling-else" entries from > libclamav/makefile.* and libclamunrar/makefile and that allowed the > "make" to run. But now, running "make install", I'm getting warnings > and the install failed. From what I've been able to find online, > this is because the gcc4.3 that is on this box doesn't support these > options. I'd tried downloading gcc5.* but trying to install it runs > off the rail into endless dependency searches. So I may have to give > up on this 101. I'll jump ahead to 103 but I would assume that I'll > have the same gcc issues. So it may be that the .100 may be the only > version that works on this older o/s. > > J > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ------- Original Message ------- > > On Monday, December 6th, 2021 at 10:06 AM, novpenguincne > <novpenguin...@protonmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm comfortable compiling from source as long as it doesn't get too >> complicated with editing and dependecies. >> >> I've been working my way up through the 32-bit versions. I was able >> to get 0.99 to run. I had to track down about a dozen dependencies >> but was finally able to get it to install. But when I run freshclam, >> I get the "Malformed Database" error which I understand is because >> the newer definition files are no readable by the older clients. >> >> So I tried the .100 version. I when through the full compile >> process, found the dependencies, and was able to run freshclam >> successfully. Then I was able to run a full system clamscan. I >> haven't tested the on-demand/on-access part of the product but at >> least .100 is looking promising. >> >> Now I'm on to the .101 version but when I "make" in the compile >> process, I"m getting the two errors you mentioned >> "-Wno-logical-op-parenthesis" and "-Wno-dangling-else". I'm in the >> process of researching them now. But I went ahead and ran the "make >> install", it seems to have installed but when I run freshclam, I'm >> back to the "malformed database" issue but I don't know if that is >> because of the errors in the "make" command. So back to testing. >> >> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >> >> ------- Original Message ------- >> >> On Friday, December 3rd, 2021 at 10:34 AM, Rick Cooper >> rcoo...@dwford.com wrote: >> >>> I have clam 0.103.4 running on a couple CentOS 5.11 boxes and I had >>> to build >>> >>> A couple things and place them in non standard locations (for >>> instance >>> >>> /opt/openssl-1.1.1g) >>> >>> There are also 4 make files that will trigger -W errors >>> >>> "-Wno-logical-op-parentheses" "-Wno-dangling-else" >>> >>> That have to be edited but I have no issues with signatures, >>> operation or >>> >>> stability. >>> >>> I am using >>> >>> openssl-1.1.1g >>> >>> curl-7.73.0 >>> >>> zlib-1.2.11 >>> >>> If you are not comfortable building the packages needed in non >>> standard >>> >>> locations and making sure >>> >>> /etc/ld.so.conf has the correct information, I would walk away from >>> this >>> >>> idea. >>> >>> novpenguincne via clamav-users wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Andrew. I am trying that now. This being an older 32-bit >>>> >>>> o/s, it has been difficult to track down the full rpm install so >>>> I've >>>> >>>> been trying to install from source. But of course that means >>>> running >>>> >>>> into dependency issues. I'll keep working on it for a bit to see if >>>> >>>> I can work through the install issues. >>>> >>>> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >>>> >>>> ------- Original Message ------- >>>> >>>>> If you keep your existing SystemV scripts and build from source >>>>> >>>>> I don't expect problems with the SystemD bits. >>>>> >>>>> You probably wont get on-access scanning. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively you could use one of your SLES15 machines as a clamd >>>>> >>>>> server >>>>> >>>>> and do your scanning with clamdscan ... >>>>> >>>>> But I would put my effort into restricting the SLES11 machine to >>>>> >>>>> local network access only (or even sneaker-net if you can work >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> that) >>>>> >>>>> before worrying about clamav. >>> >>>>> Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK >>>>> >>>>> and...@aitchison.me.uk >>>> >>>> clamav-users mailing list >>>> >>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>> >>>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>>> >>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>>> >>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > > _______________________________________________ > > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
